Identifier
F:affirming-the-consequent
Proof route
search-certificate
External status
refuted
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

For all propositions p and q: if (p implies q) holds and q holds, then p holds. THIS PROPOSITION IS FALSE; the fact is recorded with status `refuted` and carries the countermodel.

Formal statement
(assert (=> (and (=> p q) q) p))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Current fact
0 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents

Evidence

affirming-the-consequent-countermodel

Kind
witness-replay
Status
checked

Supports: p := false, q := true satisfies the negation of the proposition, so the proposition is not a tautology

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q -p axeyum-bench --example smtcomp_cli -- --evidence artifacts/facts/smt2/affirming-the-consequent.smt2 2>/dev/null | tail -1)" = sat
Evidence notes

Ran 2026-08-14: the file asserts the NEGATION of formal.statement and the solver reported `sat` with `kind=sat-model certified=1 arena=ok`. `arena=ok` is Evidence::check replaying the model against a fresh parse of the file -- the model is evaluated against the original assertions, not against the lowered form. The witness is p := false, q := true: then (p implies q) is true and q is true while p is false. Independently cross-checked: `z3 -smt2` on the same file also reports `sat`.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-14",
  "established_by": "facts-logic lane, axeyum SAT/SMT front door",
  "source": "authored from the S:logic-and-proof strand of the math-education concept graph; statement written here, not copied",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "citation": "Aristotle, Sophistical Refutations; catalogued as a formal fallacy ever since",
      "establishes": "that the inference is invalid, i.e. that the proposition recorded by this fact is false",
      "attribution": "standard textbook attribution; this lane did not consult the primary source, and records the citation as the received one"
    }
  ]
}