Identifier
F:de-morgan-laws
Proof route
smt-term-level
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
axeyum-ir.bool-evaluator, classical-two-valued-bool-semantics

Recorded description

For all propositions p and q: not (p and q) is equivalent to (not p) or (not q), and not (p or q) is equivalent to (not p) and (not q).

Formal statement
(assert (and (= (not (and p q)) (or (not p) (not q))) (= (not (or p q)) (and (not p) (not q)))))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Current fact
0 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents

Evidence

de-morgan-laws-term-level

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: For all propositions p and q: not (p and q) is equivalent to (not p) or (not q), and not (p or q) is equivalent to (not p) and (not q).

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q -p axeyum-bench --example smtcomp_cli -- --evidence artifacts/facts/smt2/neg-demorgan-laws.smt2 2>/dev/null | tail -1)" = unsat
Evidence notes

Ran 2026-08-14: the file asserts the NEGATION of formal.statement and the solver reported `unsat` with `kind=unsat-term-level certified=1 arena=ok`. `unsat-term-level` is exhaustive evaluation of the 4 Boolean assignments by the axeyum-ir evaluator alone -- it trusts neither the bit-blaster, the CNF encoder, nor the SAT solver. `arena=ok` means Evidence::check re-ran that enumeration against a FRESH PARSE of the file, independent of anything the producing solve held in memory. Independently cross-checked: `z3 -smt2` on the same file also reports `unsat`.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-14",
  "established_by": "facts-logic lane, axeyum SAT/SMT front door",
  "source": "authored from the S:logic-and-proof strand of the math-education concept graph; statement written here, not copied",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "citation": "Augustus De Morgan, Formal Logic (1847)",
      "establishes": "the two equivalences under their modern name; equivalent rules are recorded in medieval logic (William of Ockham, 14th c.) well before that",
      "attribution": "standard textbook attribution; this lane did not consult the primary source, and records the citation as the received one"
    }
  ]
}