Identifier
F:excluded-middle
Proof route
smt-term-level
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
axeyum-ir.bool-evaluator, classical-two-valued-bool-semantics

Recorded description

For every proposition p, p or (not p) holds.

Formal statement
(assert (or p (not p)))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Current fact Double negation elimination Excluded middle is not derivabl
0 direct dependencies 2 direct dependents

Evidence

excluded-middle-term-level

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: For every proposition p, p or (not p) holds.

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q -p axeyum-bench --example smtcomp_cli -- --evidence artifacts/facts/smt2/neg-excluded-middle.smt2 2>/dev/null | tail -1)" = unsat
Evidence notes

Ran 2026-08-14: the file asserts the NEGATION of formal.statement and the solver reported `unsat` with `kind=unsat-term-level certified=1 arena=ok`. `unsat-term-level` is exhaustive evaluation of the 2 Boolean assignments by the axeyum-ir evaluator alone -- it trusts neither the bit-blaster, the CNF encoder, nor the SAT solver. `arena=ok` means Evidence::check re-ran that enumeration against a FRESH PARSE of the file, independent of anything the producing solve held in memory. Independently cross-checked: `z3 -smt2` on the same file also reports `unsat`.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-14",
  "established_by": "facts-logic lane, axeyum SAT/SMT front door",
  "source": "authored from the S:logic-and-proof strand of the math-education concept graph; statement written here, not copied",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "citation": "Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book IV",
      "establishes": "the principle as a law of classical logic",
      "attribution": "standard textbook attribution; this lane did not consult the primary source, and records the citation as the received one"
    },
    {
      "citation": "L. E. J. Brouwer (1908), 'De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes'",
      "establishes": "that the principle is rejected in intuitionistic mathematics, which is why the axiom footprint of this fact is not empty",
      "attribution": "standard textbook attribution; this lane did not consult the primary source, and records the citation as the received one"
    }
  ]
}