Identifier
F:int-firstsupplementarylawnotresidue
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
Not recorded
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

The non-residue half of the first supplementary law of quadratic reciprocity. For a modulus p = 2m+1 satisfying this kernel's PrimeCond, with m ODD -- equivalently p congruent to 3 modulo 4 -- the integer -1 is NOT a quadratic residue modulo p, where `Int.IsQuadraticResidue p a` is this prelude's own definition, the existence of an x with x*x congruent to a modulo p. Nothing here is imported or axiomatised: the modulus is this kernel's constructed natural, the congruence is `Int.ModEq` over the constructed integers, and `Kernel::axiom_footprint` for this declaration is EMPTY. WHAT THIS DOES NOT CLAIM. The full law is a biconditional -- -1 is a residue mod p exactly when p is congruent to 1 modulo 4 -- and only the non-residue direction is proved here. The other direction needs a WITNESS, and the Euler-criterion route to one requires the CONVERSE of Euler's criterion (a^((p-1)/2) congruent to 1 implies a is a residue), which needs a primitive root or a root-counting argument over a polynomial ring this kernel has no List/Finset to state; `int_prelude/qr_criterion.rs`'s module doc records that gap and this theorem does not close it. So do not read this fact as deciding -1's residue-hood; it decides it in one direction only. Primality is load-bearing and is not discharged: it is what Euler's criterion needs. `Nat.Odd m` is load-bearing too and the theorem is FALSE without it -- at even m the conclusion is the opposite one (mod 5, -1 is a residue, witness 2).

Formal statement
theorem Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue : ((x0 : AxNat) -> ((x1 : And (AxNat.le (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x0))) (((x1 : AxNat) -> ((x2 : AxNat.dvd x1 (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x0))) -> Or (Eq.{1} AxNat x1 (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) (Eq.{1} AxNat x1 (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x0))))))) -> ((x2 : AxNat.Odd x0) -> Not (Int.is_quadratic_residue (Int.ofNat (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x0))) (Int.neg Int.one)))))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Addition on the integers is ass Addition on the integers is com Every integer has an additive i [generated] kernel theorem Int. Adding zero to an integer is th [generated] kernel theorem Int. [generated] kernel theorem Int. Quadratic-residue-hood respects Current fact
23 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents Graph shows the first 8 on each side.

Evidence

kernel-Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue is admitted by the trusted kernel gate with the type recorded in formal.statement.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example theorem_dependency_inventory -- Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue 2>/dev/null | grep -cE '^Int\.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue[[:space:]]'
Evidence notes

Two independent failure modes, so the exit status depends on the finding rather than on the run completing: theorem_dependency_inventory exits non-zero when a NAMED filter matches nothing, and grep -c exits 1 printing 0 when the anchored line is absent. Anchored with [[:space:]], never \t -- in a scripted (GNU) grep \t is a literal t. grep -c rather than grep -q, which would SIGPIPE the producer under pipefail. --release is MANDATORY: this tool builds creal/complex/cpoint, which overflow the default debug thread stack.

footprint-Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] -- the integer prelude's trusted surface is empty, which bounds Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --require-axiom-free integer
Evidence notes

--require-axiom-free exits non-zero when the named prelude's trusted surface (Axiom + Opaque + Quotient) is not empty, and errors rather than silently passing for a prelude the run never built. A declaration cannot depend on a trusted declaration the environment does not contain, so an empty integer surface bounds every declaration in it, including Int.firstSupplementaryLawNotResidue. This is a whole-prelude bound, not a per-declaration measurement; the per-declaration figure is the footprint column of kernel_declaration_projection, measured 0 for this row.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-31",
  "curation": "generated-unreviewed",
  "generated_by": "scripts/gen-kernel-facts.py",
  "established_by": "axeyum-lean-kernel build_int_prelude (crates/axeyum-lean-kernel/src/int_prelude/)",
  "source": "Derived mechanically from the unfiltered emit of `cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example kernel_declaration_projection`, which prints one TSV row per declaration whose fields are (prelude, kind, display name, axiom-footprint size, direct type declarations, direct declarations, direct theorems, Kernel::render_lean(declaration.ty())). formal.statement is that last field verbatim; depends_on is the direct-theorem column intersected with this ledger's registered facts; axiom_footprint is the footprint-size column, cross-checked by the whole-prelude nat_axiom_inventory run recorded in the second evidence row. No field was hand-transcribed and no prose was authored. `title`, `statement` and `notes` were then REPLACED by hand (lane first-supplementary-law, ADR-1230); every other field is the generator's output unmodified."
}