Identifier
F:ml430-int-add-le-add-iff-left-83bf44fa
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

The proposition declared as `Int.add_le_add_iff_left` in the pinned Mathlib v4.30 source.

Formal statement
∀ {b c : ℤ} (a : ℤ), a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Addition on the integers is ass Addition on the integers is com The order on the integers is co Every integer has an additive i Adding zero to an integer is th The integer order is reflexive Current fact
6 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents

Evidence

kernel-Int.add_le_add_iff_left

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: `Int.add_le_add_iff_left` is admitted as a Theorem with EXACTLY the stated shape, pinned verbatim via the kernel's own renderer: `((x0 : Int) -> ((x1 : Int) -> ((x2 : Int) -> Iff (Int.le (Int.add x2 x0) (Int.add x2 x1)) (Int.le x0 x1))))`. Built in a new file, int_prelude/order_add.rs, as a corollary of the already-derived Int.add_le_add plus Int.add_neg_cancel_right (algebra.rs) and modeq.rs's cancel_neg_add/cancel_neg_add_left -- no Int.rec case split anywhere in the new file.

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example int_theorem_inventory 2>/dev/null | awk -F'\t' '$1 == "theorem" && $2 == "Int.add_le_add_iff_left" && $4 == "((x0 : Int) -> ((x1 : Int) -> ((x2 : Int) -> Iff (Int.le (Int.add x2 x0) (Int.add x2 x1)) (Int.le x0 x1))))"' | wc -l)" -ge 1

footprint-Int.add_le_add_iff_left

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] for `Int.add_le_add_iff_left`. The `integer` prelude's trusted surface stays 0: no Axiom, no Opaque, no Quotient.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --include-constructed --require-axiom-free integer

coverage-Int.add_le_add_iff_left

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: Coverage for `Int.add_le_add_iff_left` derived from `kernel.environment()` directly, not from an inventory list -- an Int-namespace declaration missing from `derived_laws` fails this test by name.

Checker command
test "$(cargo test -p axeyum-lean-kernel --lib int_prelude::int_prelude_tests::every_int_declaration_is_checked_and_axiom_free -- --exact 2>&1 | grep -Ec 'test result: ok\. 1 passed; 0 failed')" -ge 1

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "established_by": "lane int-order-add (2026-08-29): built directly as a kernel declaration in the new file int_prelude/order_add.rs, as pure algebra on top of the already-derived Int.add_le_add (order.rs), Int.add_neg_cancel_right (algebra.rs), and modeq.rs's cancel_neg_add / cancel_neg_add_left (the latter widened from private to pub(super) for this reuse -- no other change to modeq.rs). No Int.rec case split anywhere in the new file.",
  "source": "statement-only extraction of `Int.add_le_add_iff_left` from Mathlib v4.30.0; no proof value was exposed",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "who": "the Mathlib contributors",
      "what": "the theorem declaration `Int.add_le_add_iff_left`",
      "where": "mathlib4 commit c5ea00351c28e24afc9f0f84379aa41082b1188f (v4.30.0)",
      "year": 2026,
      "attribution": "the proposition was read from the pinned statement-only inventory; the proof term and tactic trace were not consulted"
    }
  ]
}