Identifier
F:ml430-int-lt-elim-35b9d0f8
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

The proposition declared as `Int.lt.elim` in the pinned Mathlib v4.30 source.

Formal statement
∀ {a b : ℤ}, a < b → ∀ {P : Prop}, (∀ (n : ℕ), a + ↑n.succ = b → P) → P

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. A strict integer inequality is Current fact
1 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents

Evidence

kernel-Int.lt.elim

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: `Int.lt.elim` is admitted as a Theorem with EXACTLY the stated shape, pinned verbatim via the kernel's own renderer: `((x0 : Int) -> ((x1 : Int) -> ((x2 : Int.lt x0 x1) -> ((x3 : Prop) -> ((x4 : ((x4 : AxNat) -> ((x5 : Eq.{1} Int (Int.add x0 (Int.ofNat (AxNat.succ x4))) x1) -> x3))) -> x3)))))`. Same construction as `Int.le.elim`'s sibling, built by `Exists.elim` over `Int.lt_dest`'s `Exists` witness (`b = a + ofNat (succ i)`) with the equation flipped by `isymm` to match Mathlib's `a + ofNat n.succ = b` direction. Only the Exists-flavoured cousin (`Int.lt_dest`) existed under any name before this. Built in a new file, int_prelude/order_coercion.rs.

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example int_theorem_inventory 2>/dev/null | awk -F'\t' '$1 == "theorem" && $2 == "Int.lt.elim" && $4 == "((x0 : Int) -> ((x1 : Int) -> ((x2 : Int.lt x0 x1) -> ((x3 : Prop) -> ((x4 : ((x4 : AxNat) -> ((x5 : Eq.{1} Int (Int.add x0 (Int.ofNat (AxNat.succ x4))) x1) -> x3))) -> x3)))))"' | wc -l)" -ge 1

footprint-Int.lt.elim

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] for `Int.lt.elim`. The `integer` prelude's trusted surface stays 0: no Axiom, no Opaque, no Quotient.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --include-constructed --require-axiom-free integer

coverage-Int.lt.elim

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: Coverage for `Int.lt.elim` derived from `kernel.environment()` directly, not from an inventory list -- an Int-namespace declaration missing from `derived_laws` fails this test by name.

Checker command
test "$(cargo test -p axeyum-lean-kernel --lib int_prelude::int_prelude_tests::every_int_declaration_is_checked_and_axiom_free -- --exact 2>&1 | grep -Ec 'test result: ok\. 1 passed; 0 failed')" -ge 1

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "established_by": "lane int-order-coercion (2026-08-30): built directly as a kernel declaration in the new file int_prelude/order_coercion.rs, as Exists.elim applied to the already-proved F:int-lt-dest with the witness equation flipped by isymm.",
  "source": "statement-only extraction of `Int.lt.elim` from Mathlib v4.30.0; no proof value was exposed",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "who": "the Mathlib contributors",
      "what": "the theorem declaration `Int.lt.elim`",
      "where": "mathlib4 commit c5ea00351c28e24afc9f0f84379aa41082b1188f (v4.30.0)",
      "year": 2026,
      "attribution": "the proposition was read from the pinned statement-only inventory; the proof term and tactic trace were not consulted"
    }
  ]
}