Identifier
F:ml430-nat-dvd-mul-gcd-iff-dvd-mul-f9517e6b
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

The proposition declared as `Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul` in the pinned Mathlib v4.30 source.

Formal statement
∀ {k n m : ℕ}, k ∣ n * k.gcd m ↔ k ∣ n * m

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Mathlib v4.30 source propositio Mathlib v4.30 source propositio Multiplication on the naturals Current fact Mathlib v4.30 source propositio
3 direct dependencies 1 direct dependents

Evidence

kernel-Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: ∀ {k n m : ℕ}, k ∣ n * k.gcd m ↔ k ∣ n * m

Checker command
test "$(cargo run -q -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_theorem_inventory -- dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul 2>/dev/null | grep -Ec '^Nat\.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul[[:space:]]')" -ge 1
Evidence notes

`build_nat_prelude` admits `Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul` through the trusted `Kernel::add_declaration` gate. New proof, lane gcd-mul-right, in `nat_prelude/gcd_mul_right_mirrors.rs`, wired in via `declare_gcd_mul_right_mirrors`. Route: the general shape `dvd_gcd_scaled_iff` applied at (a,b,c):=(k,m,n) gives `Iff (dvd k (gcd(k,m)*n)) (dvd k (m*n))`; `mul_comm` commutes the scaling factor from the right to the left on both sides (`gcd(k,m)*n -> n*gcd(k,m)`, `m*n -> n*m`) to land on the stated form. `nat_theorem_inventory`'s rendered type is `(x0:AxNat)->(x1:AxNat)->(x2:AxNat)->Iff (dvd x0 (mul x1 (gcd x0 x2))) (dvd x0 (mul x1 x2))`, matching this fact's `formal.statement` exactly. `nat_theorem_inventory` exits non-zero for a name that does not exist (measured: exit 1, `0 theorems` on stdout, so `test -ge 1` fails). Verified no substring overlap against the sibling facts `Nat.dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul`/`Nat.dvd_gcd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul`: the anchored pattern matched exactly its own row (count 1) in a combined inventory of all three.

footprint-Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] -- the Nat prelude's trusted surface is empty

Checker command
cargo run -q -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --require-axiom-free nat
Evidence notes

`nat_axiom_inventory --require-axiom-free nat` enumerates the built Nat environment and exits non-zero unless it admits no Axiom, Opaque or Quotient declaration (measured: axiom=0 opaque=0 quotient=0). `nat_prelude_tests::every_nat_declaration_is_checked_and_axiom_free` additionally checks this theorem's own `Kernel::axiom_footprint` directly, and `gcd_mul_right_mirrors_apply_at_concrete_and_symbolic_instances` checks it applies at a concrete discriminating triple (k,n,m)=(6,3,4) -- both the statement shape and, by applying `Iff.mp` to a real `dvd_refl` proof witness, the logical content -- and symbolically at a genuinely free triple via a fresh restating theorem.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-29",
  "established_by": "not established in this ledger",
  "source": "statement-only extraction of `Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul` from Mathlib v4.30.0; no proof value was exposed",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "who": "the Mathlib contributors",
      "what": "the theorem declaration `Nat.dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul`",
      "where": "mathlib4 commit c5ea00351c28e24afc9f0f84379aa41082b1188f (v4.30.0)",
      "year": 2026,
      "attribution": "the proposition was read from the pinned statement-only inventory; the proof term and tactic trace were not consulted"
    }
  ]
}