Mathlib v4.30 source proposition Nat.lor_comm

Identifier: F:ml430-nat-lor-comm-2666d7ef
Proof route: kernel-lean
External status: proved
Axiom footprint: Empty

Recorded description

The proposition declared as `Nat.lor_comm` in the pinned Mathlib v4.30 source.

Formal statement

∀ (n m : ℕ), n ||| m = m ||| n

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

1 direct dependencies 0 direct dependents

Evidence

reconciliation-Nat.lor_comm

Kind: kernel-term
Status: checked

Supports: ∀ (n m : ℕ), n ||| m = m ||| n

Evidence notes

Registers an independently constructed native theorem (`F:nat-lor-comm`, `Nat.lor_comm` in `nat_prelude/rec_agreement.rs`) whose proposition definitionally matches this proof-free imported goal -- Mathlib's `Nat.lor` is `Nat.bitwise or`, and our `Nat.lor` is proved equal to the `bitwise or_fn` specialization by `Nat.bitwise_or_eq_lor`, so this closes the SAME function's commutativity, not a lookalike about a different definition (the criterion this repository uses to decide when flipping an `ml430` mirror is honest: Mathlib's `def` is the same function, not merely a theorem about a different one). No Autogenesis operation produced the theorem; the route taken (same-fuel commutativity, carrying `Le` hypotheses `land_comm`'s analogue does not need, plus fuel-irrelevance through a shared fuel `m + n`) is NOT Mathlib's own route via `bitwise_comm`, which is why `depends_on` still names the still-open `F:ml430-nat-bitwise-comm-1a273bae` -- that edge records curriculum lineage, not a dependency this proof actually used.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-18",
  "established_by": "not established in this ledger",
  "source": "statement-only extraction of `Nat.lor_comm` from Mathlib v4.30.0; no proof value was exposed",
  "prior_art": [
    {
      "who": "the Mathlib contributors",
      "what": "the theorem declaration `Nat.lor_comm`",
      "where": "mathlib4 commit c5ea00351c28e24afc9f0f84379aa41082b1188f (v4.30.0)",
      "year": 2026,
      "attribution": "the proposition was read from the pinned statement-only inventory; the proof term and tactic trace were not consulted"
    }
  ]
}