Identifier
F:nat-div-mul-succ-le-of-le
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
proved
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

For every `m`, `n` and every `x` with `x + 1 <= m`: `floor((2n+1)(x+1) / (2m+1)) <= n`. This is the one arithmetic fact ADR-1544's residue 5 was short of, and it is a fact about the Eisenstein shape rather than about counting. WHY IT IS NOT ONE LINE: the bound is `q(x+1) <= q*m < pp(n+1)`, and the strict half is `2nm + m < 2mn + 2m + n + 1`, i.e. `0 < m + n + 1`. But `mul q m` is STUCK in both directions -- `Nat.mul` recurses on its RIGHT argument, so `mul q m` with `m` symbolic reduces to nothing, and `mul pp n` likewise. One `Nat.mul_comm` on each turns them into `mul m (succ (2n))` and `mul n (succ (2m))`, which iota-reduce to `mul m (2n) + m` and `mul n (2m) + n`, and the two leading products are the same number `2mn` written two different ways -- a nine-step chain through `mul_assoc`, `right_distrib` and `mul_comm` to identify. Everything after that is `Nat.add_lt_add_left`, `Nat.succ_le_succ`, `Nat.mul_le_mul_left`, `Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt`, `Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul` and `Nat.le_of_lt_succ`, plus four one-hole transports at `Le`/`Lt` positions where the Nat-valued `NatOps::congr` does not apply. `Kernel::axiom_footprint` is EMPTY. Admitted on the first attempt.

Formal statement
theorem Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le : ((x0 : AxNat) -> ((x1 : AxNat) -> ((x2 : AxNat) -> ((x3 : AxNat.le (AxNat.succ x2) x0) -> AxNat.le (AxNat.div (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x1)) (AxNat.succ x2)) (AxNat.succ (AxNat.mul (AxNat.succ (AxNat.succ AxNat.zero)) x0))) x1))))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Mathlib v4.30 source propositio Mathlib v4.30 source propositio Addition on the naturals is ass [generated] kernel theorem Nat. n is <= n plus anything [generated] kernel theorem Nat. [generated] kernel theorem Nat. Multiplication on the naturals Current fact Eisenstein's floor-sum identity
15 direct dependencies 1 direct dependents Graph shows the first 8 on each side.

Evidence

kernel-Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le is admitted by the trusted kernel gate with the type recorded in formal.statement.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example theorem_dependency_inventory -- Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le 2>/dev/null | grep -cE '^Nat\.div_mul_succ_le_of_le[[:space:]]'
Evidence notes

Two independent failure modes, so the exit status depends on the finding rather than on the run completing: theorem_dependency_inventory exits non-zero when a NAMED filter matches nothing, and grep -c exits 1 printing 0 when the anchored line is absent. RUN WITH A NEGATIVE CONTROL and it was: the real name prints 1 with both pipeline stages at 0, a one-character typo prints 0 with both stages at 1. Anchored with [[:space:]], never \t -- in a scripted (GNU) grep \t is a literal t. grep -c rather than grep -q, which would SIGPIPE the producer under pipefail. --release is MANDATORY, and so is a FRESH build: this lane hit the stale-binary trap here, and a prebuilt inventory reported this very theorem ABSENT. `cargo run` rebuilds; a prebuilt binary does not. Pass ONE name per invocation.

footprint-Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] -- the natural-number prelude's trusted surface is empty, which bounds Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --require-axiom-free nat
Evidence notes

--require-axiom-free exits non-zero when the named prelude's trusted surface (Axiom + Opaque + Quotient) is not empty, and errors rather than silently passing for a prelude the run never built. A declaration cannot depend on a trusted declaration the environment does not contain, so an empty nat surface bounds every declaration in it. This is a whole-prelude bound, not a per-declaration measurement; the per-declaration figure is measured 0 by the axiom-footprint assertion in eisenstein_floor_min_free_tests.rs.

numeric-Nat.div_mul_succ_le_of_le

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: C6 of ADR-1552's check script verifies the min-free identity at 317 coprime odd pairs, and C6b verifies separately that the cap never binds on either axis at any of them -- the fact the bound lemma states. M11 refutes the same reading at pp=2, q=5, m=1, n=0, a general instance where the cap does bind.

Checker command
python3 docs/research/09-decisions/adr-1552-eisenstein-checks.py
Evidence notes

Exit status depends on the finding: a claim that fails, or a control that behaves other than as recorded, exits 1. Verified by mutating the script itself in a scratch copy with one uniquely-named file per mutant: 19 of 19 mutations exit 1, including shifting the min-free floor sum, making C6b's cap check fire spuriously, and making M11's witness satisfy the cap. TWO mutations were deliberately NOT run and the omissions are recorded: vacuity edits (`if FAILURES:` and C6b's cap condition replaced by `if False:`) are no-ops against a PASSING baseline, so running them would measure nothing.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-09-02",
  "curation": "curated",
  "established_by": "axeyum-lean-kernel build_nat_prelude (crates/axeyum-lean-kernel/src/nat_prelude/eisenstein_floor_min_free.rs)",
  "source": "formal.statement is taken verbatim from the kernel's own rendering (Kernel::render_lean of the admitted declaration type; the same string is pinned character for character in eisenstein_floor_min_free_tests.rs). depends_on is the direct-theorem column of theorem_dependency_inventory intersected with this ledger's registered facts, so it is an INTERSECTION and not the full dependency set. Nothing about the statement was hand transcribed; title, statement and the evidence notes were authored (lane eisenstein-3)."
}