Identifier
F:rat-cross-of-eq
Proof route
kernel-lean
External status
Not recorded
Axiom footprint
Empty

Recorded description

MECHANICALLY GENERATED, UNREVIEWED PROSE -- this sentence deliberately makes NO mathematical characterisation of the theorem. What is asserted, and all that is asserted, is this: the kernel declaration `Rat.cross_of_eq` is a `Declaration::Theorem` admitted into the environment by `build_rat_prelude` through the trusted `Kernel::add_declaration` gate, which re-derives its type from its proof term; its type is recorded verbatim in `formal.statement`; and its axiom footprint, as computed by `Kernel::axiom_footprint`, is empty. The authoritative content of this fact is `formal.statement`. A human-readable characterisation of what Rat.cross_of_eq SAYS has not been supplied, because a generator cannot supply one honestly -- see `notes`.

Formal statement
theorem Rat.cross_of_eq : ((x0 : Rat) -> ((x1 : Rat) -> ((x2 : Eq.{1} Rat x0 x1) -> Eq.{1} Int (Int.mul (Rat.num x0) (Int.ofNat (Rat.den x1))) (Int.mul (Rat.num x1) (Int.ofNat (Rat.den x0))))))

Dependencies

The graph shows direct ledger edges. Follow a node to open its artifact page.

Direct dependencies appear to the left. The current fact is in the center. Facts that depend directly on it appear to the right. Current fact [generated] kernel theorem Rat.
0 direct dependencies 1 direct dependents

Evidence

kernel-Rat.cross_of_eq

Kind
kernel-term
Status
checked

Supports: Rat.cross_of_eq is admitted by the trusted kernel gate with the type recorded in formal.statement.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example theorem_dependency_inventory -- Rat.cross_of_eq 2>/dev/null | grep -cE '^Rat\.cross_of_eq[[:space:]]'
Evidence notes

Two independent failure modes, so the exit status depends on the finding rather than on the run completing: theorem_dependency_inventory exits non-zero when a NAMED filter matches nothing, and grep -c exits 1 printing 0 when the anchored line is absent. Anchored with [[:space:]], never \t -- in a scripted (GNU) grep \t is a literal t. grep -c rather than grep -q, which would SIGPIPE the producer under pipefail. --release is MANDATORY: this tool builds creal/complex/cpoint, which overflow the default debug thread stack.

footprint-Rat.cross_of_eq

Kind
exhaustive-enumeration
Status
checked

Supports: axiom_footprint: [] -- the rat prelude's trusted surface is empty, which bounds Rat.cross_of_eq.

Checker command
cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example nat_axiom_inventory -- --require-axiom-free rat
Evidence notes

--require-axiom-free exits non-zero when the named prelude's trusted surface (Axiom + Opaque + Quotient) is not empty, and errors rather than silently passing for a prelude the run never built. A declaration cannot depend on a trusted declaration the environment does not contain, so an empty rat surface bounds every declaration in it, including Rat.cross_of_eq. This is a whole-prelude bound, not a per-declaration measurement; the per-declaration figure is the footprint column of kernel_declaration_projection, measured 0 for this row.

Provenance

{
  "date": "2026-08-27",
  "curation": "generated-unreviewed",
  "generated_by": "scripts/gen-kernel-facts.py",
  "established_by": "axeyum-lean-kernel build_rat_prelude (crates/axeyum-lean-kernel/src/rat_prelude/)",
  "source": "Derived mechanically from the unfiltered emit of `cargo run -q --release -p axeyum-lean-kernel --example kernel_declaration_projection`, which prints one TSV row per declaration whose fields are (prelude, kind, display name, axiom-footprint size, direct type declarations, direct declarations, direct theorems, Kernel::render_lean(declaration.ty())). formal.statement is that last field verbatim; depends_on is the direct-theorem column intersected with this ledger's registered facts; axiom_footprint is the footprint-size column, cross-checked by the whole-prelude nat_axiom_inventory run recorded in the second evidence row. No field was hand-transcribed and no prose was authored."
}